FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Architecture| Course Name |
Architectural Design I
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ARCH 201
|
Fall
|
1
|
8
|
5
|
8
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkCase StudyCritical feedbackApplication: Experiment / Laboratory / WorkshopLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | ||||||
| Course Objectives | The first design studio aims to explore the architectural design process through two projects divided into discrete learning modules. It builds upon foundational skills in orthographic projection and physical modeling while fostering an awareness of how people inhabit space. The studio places special emphasis on the complex dialogue established between the building and its broader environmental and site context. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The overarching theme of the second-year studio is HABITATION, with ARCH 201 specifically centering on the concept of PERSONAL CONTEXT. The course guides students through the design of small- to medium-scale architecture via a structured series of assignments and workshops. At its core, the studio emphasizes the fundamentals of architectural design and its inseparable relationship with the site. Navigating between the land and the sea, students investigate how programmatic requirements, spatial organization, and tectonic expression are fundamentally shaped by the dialogue between the building, its site, and its users. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction to ARCH 201 and P1. | |
| 2 | P1 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 3 | P1 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 4 | P1 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 5 | P1 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 6 | P1 | |
| 7 | Project 1 – Final Review & Exhibition | |
| 8 | MIDTERMS WEEK | |
| 9 | Introduction to Project 2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 10 | P2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 11 | P2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 12 | P2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 13 | P2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 14 | P2 | Sketch, Model, Plan, Section |
| 15 | Project 2 - Final Review | |
| 16 | FINALS WEEK |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Ching, F.D.K., Architecture: Form, Space, and Order, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996. * Neufert, E., Architects’ Data, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 1983.* Tutt, P. and D. Adler, eds., New Metric Handbook, Butterworth Architecture, London and others, 1988.* Ching, F.D.K., Chapter 10: Diagraming, in Design Drawing, John Wiley & Sons Inc, NY, 1998* Criss B Mills, Chapter 1: START: Equipments, Materials and Model Types, in Designing with Models, John Wiley & Sons Inc, NY, 2000* Crower, N. & Laseau, P., Introduction, in Visual Notes for Architects & Designers, John Wiley & Sons Inc, NY, 1984* Crower, N. & Laseau, P., Notebook Entries, in Visual Notes for Architects & Designers, John Wiley & Sons Inc, NY, 1984 |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Recommended Reference Sources:* Bayram, A., Dictionary of Technical Terms: EnglishTurkish, TurkishEnglish, Fono, Istanbul, 1998.* Ching, F.D.K., Architectural Graphics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.* Ching, F.D.K., A Visual Dictionary of Architecture, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.* Hasol, D., Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü, YEM, 2002.* Öke, A., A Short Thesaurus and Vocabulary of Architectural Terms for Design Studio, Literatur, 2005.* Porter, T., Archispeak: An Illustrated Guide to Architectural Terms, Spon Press, London, New York, 2006.* Rasmussen, S.E., Experiencing Architecture, Chapman & Hall, London, 1959. |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
5
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
20
|
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
25
|
| Project |
1
|
35
|
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams |
1
|
15
|
| Midterm | ||
| Final Exam | ||
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
5
|
100
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
1
|
16
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours |
16
|
8
|
128
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
0
|
||
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
20
|
20
|
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
26
|
26
|
| Project |
1
|
34
|
34
|
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
1
|
16
|
16
|
| Midterms |
0
|
||
| Final Exam |
0
|
||
| Total |
240
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to offer a professional level of architectural services. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of design and construction. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to understand methods to collaborate and coordinate with other disciplines in providing project delivery services.
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to understand, interpret, and evaluate methods, concepts, and theories in architecture emerging from both research and practice. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to develop environmentally and socially responsible architectural strategies at multiple scales. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to develop a critical understanding of historical traditions, global culture and diversity in the production of the built environment. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in construction materials, products, components, and assemblies based on their performance within building systems. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to present architectural ideas and proposals in visual, written, and oral form through using contemporary computer-based information and communication technologies and media. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to demonstrate a critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and direct self-education skills for developing solutions to architectural problems and design execution. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to take the initiative for continuous knowledge update and education as well as demonstrate a lifelong learning approach in the field of Architecture. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Architecture and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..