FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Architecture| Course Name |
Architectural Programming and Space Planning
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ARCH 318
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | To improve students' understanding of architectural programming and space planning processes in architectural design. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | This course introduces two key topics concerning the practice of architectural design, namely architectural programming and space planning. The building programming defines a collaborative process –occurring relatively earlier in visioning processes- where a set of descriptions that define a future facility is gathered and organized within an architectural program. Space planning, on the other hand, refers to a skill that is employed during design development phases. This particular practice involves a form of translation of architectural program and vision into floor layout. This course provides a content where students develop skills for both architectural programming and space planning. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction | postscript: The American Institute of Architects. (2008, 14th. ed). The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken: New Jersey. (Section on Programming, p. 507-519) |
| 2 | Concepts and Approaches in Architectural Programming | Cherry, E. (1999). Programming for design: from theory to practice. New York: John Wiley. (Chapter 4) |
| 3 | Data Gathering and Organization | Peña, W., & Parshall, S. (2001). Problem seeking: an architectural programming primer (4th ed.). New York: Wiley. Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by Design: Environment / Behavior / Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. Cambridge University Press. NY. (Chapter 8, 9) |
| 4 | Case Studies in Programming | Peña, W., & Parshall, S. (2001). Problem seeking: an architectural programming primer (4th ed.). New York: Wiley. (Chapter 1) |
| 5 | Programming Exercises | |
| 6 | Mid-term 1 | |
| 7 | Concepts and Approaches in Space Planning | The American Institute of Architects. (2008, 14th. ed). The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken: New Jersey. (Section on Space Planning) |
| 8 | Representational practices in Space Planning | Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by Design: Environment / Behavior / Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. Cambridge University Press. NY. (Chapter 8, 9) |
| 9 | Case Studies in Space Planning | Kubba, Sam. (2003). Space planning for commercial and residential interiors. McGraw-Hill: New York. (Chapter 1) |
| 10 | Mid-term 2 | |
| 11 | Programming Exercises I | Malkin, J. (2002). Medical and dental space planning: A comprehensive guide to design, equipment and clinical procedures. John Wiley & Sons: New York. (Chapter 2) |
| 12 | Programming Exercises II | Karlen, M. (2009). Space Planning Basics. John Wiley & Sons: New York. (Chapter 7) |
| 13 | Final Project Set-up | |
| 14 | Final Project Studies | |
| 15 | Student Presentations | |
| 16 | Review of the Semester |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Cherry, E. (1999). Programming for design: from theory to practice. New York: John Wiley. Karlen, M. (2009). Space Planning Basics. John Wiley & Sons: New York. Kubba, Sam. (2003). Space planning for commercial and residential interiors. McGraw-Hill: New York. Malkin, J. (2002). Medical and dental space planning: A comprehensive guide to design, equipment and clinical procedures. John Wiley & Sons: New York. Peña, W., & Parshall, S. (2001). Problem seeking: an architectural programming primer (4th ed.). New York: Wiley. The American Institute of Architects. (2008, 14th. ed). The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken: New Jersey. (Section on Programming, p. 507-519) Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by Design: Environment / Behavior / Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. Cambridge University Press. New York. |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
16
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
18
|
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
36
|
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
2
|
30
|
| Final Exam | ||
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
4
|
64
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
36
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
0
|
||
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
12
|
12
|
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
44
|
44
|
| Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
2
|
3
|
6
|
| Final Exam |
0
|
||
| Total |
110
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to offer a professional level of architectural services. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of design and construction. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to understand methods to collaborate and coordinate with other disciplines in providing project delivery services.
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to understand, interpret, and evaluate methods, concepts, and theories in architecture emerging from both research and practice. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to develop environmentally and socially responsible architectural strategies at multiple scales. |
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to develop a critical understanding of historical traditions, global culture and diversity in the production of the built environment. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in construction materials, products, components, and assemblies based on their performance within building systems. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to present architectural ideas and proposals in visual, written, and oral form through using contemporary computer-based information and communication technologies and media. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to demonstrate a critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and direct self-education skills for developing solutions to architectural problems and design execution. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to take the initiative for continuous knowledge update and education as well as demonstrate a lifelong learning approach in the field of Architecture. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Architecture and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..