FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Architecture| Course Name |
Analysis of the Built Environment
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ARCH 370
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkProblem SolvingCase StudyQ&ACritical feedbackJuryField trip / ObservationLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course is designed to enrich the professional skills of architecture students by means of analysis and rethinking on a particular built environment (urban, rural, industrial, domestic, commercial, etc). It is based upon selected readings and field trips where students will carry out an analysis of a selected location using a number of analytical techniques. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The course begins by establishing a common understanding of notions of space and place, initially at a small scale and then at an urban scale. We establish a definition of what the ‘built environment’ might include. After a number of classroom based sessions students are assigned a neighborhood and will put what they have learned into practice. The final output will present a number of annotated drawings which will be reviewed at the end of the course. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses |
X
|
|
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Course Introduction | Readers will be provided as necessary |
| 2 | Architecture and the Built Environment – what is it and why should we analyze it? | |
| 3 | Placemaking 1 - fieldwork | |
| 4 | Placemaking 2 | |
| 5 | Elements of the Built Environment | |
| 6 | The sensory dimension of the built environment. | |
| 7 | Fieldwork – Sensory analysis | |
| 8 | Mid-term exams - no classes | |
| 9 | Student presentations of sensescape data | |
| 10 | In-class working – compiling final boards | |
| 11 | In-class working – compiling final boards | |
| 12 | In-class working – compiling final boards | |
| 13 | Final group tutorials | |
| 14 | Final presentations and reviews | |
| 15 | Semester Review | |
| 16 | Semester Review |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | - |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Carmona, M., & Tiesdell, S. 2007. Urban Design Reader. Oxford: Elsevier. 181-184, ISBN-13: 978-0-7506-6531-5
|
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
30
|
| Project |
1
|
60
|
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm | ||
| Final Exam | ||
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
5
|
100
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
2
|
28
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
6
|
12
|
| Project |
1
|
8
|
8
|
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
0
|
||
| Final Exam |
0
|
||
| Total |
96
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to offer a professional level of architectural services. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of design and construction. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to understand methods to collaborate and coordinate with other disciplines in providing project delivery services.
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to understand, interpret, and evaluate methods, concepts, and theories in architecture emerging from both research and practice. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to develop environmentally and socially responsible architectural strategies at multiple scales. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to develop a critical understanding of historical traditions, global culture and diversity in the production of the built environment. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in construction materials, products, components, and assemblies based on their performance within building systems. |
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to present architectural ideas and proposals in visual, written, and oral form through using contemporary computer-based information and communication technologies and media. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to demonstrate a critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and direct self-education skills for developing solutions to architectural problems and design execution. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to take the initiative for continuous knowledge update and education as well as demonstrate a lifelong learning approach in the field of Architecture. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Architecture and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..