FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Architecture
GENS 202 | Course Introduction and Application Information
Course Name |
Philosophy Of Science
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
GENS 202
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Service Course
|
|||||
Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | Lecture / Presentation | |||||
Course Coordinator | ||||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | In this course it is aimed that the students would see the relation of science and philosophy in a historical and holistic way by analysing examples from different disciplines. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
1 | Introduction to the course: Major themes in the philosophy of science | Ch. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 |
2 | The Scientific Revolution: A very short history of the scientific revolution | Ch. 1.5 |
3 | Empiricism I: The empiricist tradition, the Vienna Circle and the Central Ideas of Logical Positivism | Ch. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 |
4 | Empiricism II: Logical Empiricism, the Web of Belief, Experience, Experiment and Action | Ch. 2.4, 2.5 |
5 | The Problem of Induction: Induction, Deduction, Confirmation, Explanatory Inference, the ravens problem | Ch. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 |
6 | Popper: Conjecture and Refutation. Popper’s unique place in the philosophy of science, Popper’s theory of science and scientific change, idea of falsification, objections to Popper’s ideas | Ch. 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 |
7 | Kuhn and Scientific Revolutions I: Paradigms, anomaly and crisis, revolutions | Ch. 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 |
8 | Kuhn and Scientific Revolutions II: Incommensurability, relativism, progress | Ch. 5.6, 5.7, 5.8 |
9 | Theories and Framework I: Lakatos and research programs, Laudan and Research Traditions | Ch. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 |
10 | Theories and Framework II: Feyerabend and his anything goes approach | Ch. 6.4, 6.5, 6.6 |
11 | The Challenge from Sociology of Science: Merton and the old sociology of science, strong program, Leviathan, Latour | Ch. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 |
12 | Science and Politics: Feminist ideas of science, sex and gender in behavioral biology, feminist epistemology, values | Ch. 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6 |
13 | Naturalistic Philosophy: Naturalism, Quine, the role of observation, division of labor in science, competition, goals of science | Ch. 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6 |
14 | Scientific Realism: Science and realism, empiricism vs. realism, metaphysical constructivism, idea of progress | Ch. 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7 |
15 | Review of the Semester | |
16 | Final Exam |
Course Notes/Textbooks | |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | ||
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | ||
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | ||
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm |
2
|
60
|
Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
2
|
15
|
30
|
Final Exam |
1
|
30
|
30
|
Total |
156
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
1 | To be able to offer a professional level of architectural services. |
|||||
2 | To be able to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of design and construction. |
|||||
3 | To be able to understand methods to collaborate and coordinate with other disciplines in providing project delivery services.
|
|||||
4 | To be able to understand, interpret, and evaluate methods, concepts, and theories in architecture emerging from both research and practice. |
|||||
5 | To be able to develop environmentally and socially responsible architectural strategies at multiple scales. |
|||||
6 | To be able to develop a critical understanding of historical traditions, global culture and diversity in the production of the built environment. |
|||||
7 | To be able to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in construction materials, products, components, and assemblies based on their performance within building systems. |
|||||
8 | To be able to present architectural ideas and proposals in visual, written, and oral form through using contemporary computer-based information and communication technologies and media. |
|||||
9 | To be able to demonstrate a critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and direct self-education skills for developing solutions to architectural problems and design execution. |
|||||
10 | To be able to take the initiative for continuous knowledge update and education as well as demonstrate a lifelong learning approach in the field of Architecture. |
|||||
11 | To be able to collect data in the areas of Architecture and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1) |
|||||
12 | To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
|||||
13 | To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
NEWS |ALL NEWS
Our 2023 Graduate Ceyda Coşar is among the winners of the SMD Students' Graduation Project Award
Our 2023 graduate Ceyda Coşar has won an award at the İZMİR SMD Student Graduation Project Awards.
They examined building, showcased their models
Izmir University of Economics (IUE) Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture students examined 58 buildings in Izmir in terms of earthquake resistance
They produced ‘vegan leather’ from olive pulp
Olive, which is one of the values unique to the Aegean and has been an indispensable element of tables for centuries as
‘Bacterial cellulose’ in fashion
Filiz Özbengi Uslu, Gözde Damla Turhan and Selen Çiçek from Izmir University of Economics (IUE) Faculty of Fine Arts and Design prepared
"The Nature of Architecture"
The Department of Architecture hosted Landscape Architect Artem Piskunov ve Architect Ahmed Al-Ali within the context of the "the Nature of Architecture"
‘Became the first Turk registered to the Portuguese Chamber of Architects’
Bengisu Özpirinççi (32), graduate of Izmir University of Economics (IUE) Department of Architecture, established her own brand in Portugal, where she went
Our 2020 graduate Ayça Özüm Sevinç was granted Holland Scholarship
Our 2020 graduate, Ayça Özüm Sevinç, was accepted to the Master of Architecture program that offers working and studying simultaneously for 4
She became a history detective, received scholarships from the USA and England
Realizing projects with the aim of unearthing historical caravanserais around the world and transferring them to future generations, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Güzden